Showing posts with label dr pizano. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dr pizano. Show all posts

Friday, April 22, 2011

Miami Dade Shelter Report 2001 - 2010

This spreadsheet represents MDAS shelter records FY 01/02 through FY 04/05.  This represents a period of time where MDAS was managed by Miami Dade Police Department.


Category

FY 01/02

FY 02/03

FY 03/04

FY 04/05

Intake

30,640

32,423

28,623

28,566

Adoptions

2,796

4,238

3,466

3,002

Transfers**

875

774

1,611

1,365

Return to owner

741

1,038

1,164

1,300

Number animals saved

4,412

6,050

6,241

5,667

Number euthanized

20,294

20033

19,071

18,722

Percent euthanized

66%

62%

67%

66%

This spreadsheet represents the data from FY 05/06 through FY 09/10 which represents the time period after Dr Sara Pizano took over managing the Miami Dade Animal Services Unit.


Category

FY 05/06 (*)

FY 06/07

FY 07/08

FY 08/09

FY 09/10

Intake

30,136

34,163

34,504

37,332

35,924

Adoptions

6,000

6,724

5,887

8,327

8,334

Transfers**

1,751

2,261

3,261

3,888

4,074

Return to owner

1,289

1,428

1,482

1,485

1,534

Number animals saved

9,040

         10, 413

10,630

13,700

13,942

Number euthanized

20,022

22,378

21,920

21,367

20,112

Percent euthanized

66%

65%

63%

57%

56%

Evaluating Key Shelter Performance Factors


Adoptions


The number of dogs and/or cats adopted from MDAS is a critical measurement in life saving performance.  Adoptions during the four years prior to Dr Pizano's tenure averaged around 3,300 per year.  As the numbers show adoptions doubled the first year alone to an astounding number of 6,000 dogs/cats being adopted back into the community.  Adoptions have continued to climb at a rate of 37% in years FY 08 through FY 2010.  Adoptions only saw a slight decline in FY 2007/2008 which represents the beginning of south Florida economic decline.


This is an area where improvement under Dr Pizano's leadership will continue once the new shelter is built.  The fact that she has been successful in improving adoptions despite being burdened with an old, disease pronged shelter is refreshing. 
Performance Grade - A


Rescue Transfers


Rescue transfers were almost non existent while MDAS was under police department control - averaging around 1,150 dogs/cats each year.  Many of these transfers occurred in 2003 - 2005 as a result of rescue groups stepping up to pull animals and as a result of a loosening of restrictions on rescue groups because management was under fire.  

Under the watch of the "old guard" police, policies enforced  included banning volunteers, prohibiting rescue volunteers from taking pictures of dogs/cats listed as urgent, and a data base that was so inaccurate it was useless for all practical purposes.

With the implementation of MDAS "rescue partners" program dogs and cats being transferred to rescue has risen dramatically to over 4,000 during the last fiscal year.  This represents an increase of over 300% from the results under the Miami Dade Police Department control. 


This is also an area where the rescue community can continue to see improvement if they double or triple the number of rescue groups that become team players with MDAS Partner program. 
Performance Grade A Plus


Return To Owners


Returning family pets to their owners is a community effort.  It requires policies to be put in effect that encourage pet identification and offers low cost options that assist pet owners with identifying their pets.  These numbers have remained fairly stagnated with  only a slight bump in the number of pets returned home.  Still the number of pets returned to owners under the old leadership team averaged slightly over 1,050 each year to an average of slightly over 1,400 (or 40%) under the new leadership team.
Performance Grade - B - Minus/C Plus


Number of Animal Saved


In FY 01/02 less then 15% of the dogs/cats entering the shelter survived.  Many died horrible deaths due to diseases contracted during even very short stays at the shelter.  In FY 02/03 the number saved only increased to 19%.  In FY 03/04 the number of animals saved improved to 22% in part due to a 10% decrease in the number of animals entering the shelter.  In FY 04/05 or the last year of management under the police department the number of animals saved dropped to 20% - in other words, MDAS was killing four out of five dogs and cats entering the shelter.


During Dr Pizano's first year the number of animals saved jumped to 30% (FY 05/06).  This represented an increase of 63% (5667 to 9040) in one year alone.  FY 06/07 that number of animals saved increased to 10,413 or another 10% increase from the previous year.  However, this increase was negated by an increase in intake numbers of 13% as intake climbed from 30,000 dogs/cats entering the shelter to over 34,000.


In FY 07/08 MDAS was able to hold it's own on the number of saved animals despite what was the beginning of an economic recession taking hold in south Florida and throughout the country. 


In FY 08/09 the number of animals saved again increased from the previous year by over 30% as it climbed from 10,630 to 13,700.  This number represents a sustained increase of over 250% (5,667) from the previous total under the "old guard" of MDAS mismanagement in 2005. 

MDAS was able to improve the number of animals saved slightly in FY 09/10 as the saved numbers rose to 13,942.  Performance grade on saving animals - A plus.


Shelter Intake


Unfortunately, all of the gains made in adoptions and animals transferred to rescue has been negated by an startling increase in the number of animals entering the shelter (intake) over the last five years.  Intake has climbed from a four year average of 30,000 dogs/cats a year FY 01 through FY 05 to an average of over 34,400 during the last five years.  This represents an increase of 15% on intake alone. 


Intake numbers represent a community problem that must be dealt with in order to reverse this trend.  It is NOT an area where shelter management of an open admission shelter has much control.

Dr Pizano has put forth a number of recommendations that focus on reducing intake by expanding spay/neuter programs, promoting  pro-active pet retention programs and partnering with rescue partners by transfering animals before they enter the shelter.

Performance Grade - community D MINUS - MDAS policy review - B - minus


Number of dogs and cats killed at MDAS


No one disagrees that the 20,000 dogs and cats that are consistently being killed at MDAS remains a serious community problem for which solutions must be found.  Those solutions are NOT going to come from the constant attacks from many groups who aren't even from the Miami Dade/South Florida area. 


The solutions needed for MDAS will only come by continuing to build a foundation of local support that can address the growth in intake numbers, by doubling even tripling the number of rescue partners and a surge in efforts to educate the community on responsible pet ownership while providing pet owners the programs needed for this transition.  The solution also requires building the long overdue new shelter as well.


History of Miami Dade Animal Services
Note: Miami Dade Animal Services (MDAS) became an independent department in October of 2005.


Animal Services was originally a part of the Dade County Public Safety Department, and was later designated as the Animal Care and Control Division under the Public Works Department.


In 2001, the Miami-Dade Police Department took over the operation, and on October 1, 2005, the Animal Services Department (ASD) was created as a stand-alone entity in an effort to provide focused care for the County’s animal population.

By becoming an independent entity, the Animal Services Department is be able to concentrate its resources on its core mission of caring for the animals in its custody. MDAS receives approximately 22 percent of its budget from the County’s General Operating Fund, while the remaining 78 percent is derived through dog license tag sales, shelter fees, enforcement fines, private grants, and donations.


Miami Dade Animal Services Director - Dr Sara Pizano


Sara Pizano, D.V.M., is responsible for the oversight of the Miami-Dade Animal Services Department.

She began her career as a veterinarian intern at the Animal Medical Center in New York City, one of the busiest animal centers in the country. She moved to South Florida in 1998 and has been very involved in the animal care community.


She brings to Miami-Dade more than 11 years of experience in the field of veterinary medicine and animal services delivery, including five years as the director of veterinary services for the Humane Society of Broward County, where she was responsible for managing a $1 million budget and increasing clinic donations by 231 percent.


Dr. Pizano holds a Doctor of Veterinary Medicine from Cornell University.


Five Year Performance Report Highlights


In 2005, the Miami Dade Animal Services Department (MDAS) became independent, answering directly to the County Manager. Since then, a myriad of changes and improvements have been and continue to be made.


In 2010 the Department was presented with the Outstanding Team Achievement award for a spay/neuter initiative as MDAS was responsible for the sterilization of over 4,000 community cats with minimal impact to the operational budget.


Miami-Dade Animal Services is one of the top ten largest shelters in the country, based on the number of animals abandoned. Between FY 2005-2006 and 2008-2009, the intake of animals increased by:



  • Introduced micro chipping for community pets that includes automatic registration (2008)
  • Created new educational handouts to prepare pet owners for adoption and care of their new pet
  • Lost and Found Procedure Improvements
  • Created lost pet handouts for owners
  • Trained staff to enter tag/chip information into Chameleon (pet and owner information database) to generate reports for shelter animals with identification
  • Created Pet Detectives Volunteer Program to increase reunification rate of lost pets with their owners
  • Updated adoption and spay/neuter contracts to include the picture, microchip, tag and animal ID (2005)
  • Introduced spay/neuter agreement to decrease time shelter pets were exposed to infectious diseases.
Community Outreach


• Advertised on trains, buses, newspapers and magazines
• Developed an ad campaign featuring three (3) uniform messages :   Spay/Neuter o Adopt-a-Pet
o
• Secured approximately $50,000+ annually in in-kind advertising (ongoing)
• Secured regularly featured spots on Comcast Pets on Demand, Telemundo 51 and GenTV
• Partnered with Petsmart to do mobile adoptions (2009)
• Created a Facebook page



Concentrated outreach efforts have helped to increase adoptions and improve MDAS’s overall visibility and reputation throughout the community, though proper funding has not been allocated in the budget to this area. MDAS has developed advertising campaigns, improved media relations and developed partner websites that all contribute to getting people involved and saving more animals.

Outreach efforts included the following:


Rescue Partnership


In 2006, a formal Rescue Partnership was created with 501c3 Rescue Groups and humane societies. Twice daily, our Rescue Partners receive auto e-mails via the Chameleon shelter software with a list of shelter pets that would most likely not be moved into adoptions.


For the FY 2009-2010, there were sixty (60) Rescue Partners, one of the largest partnerships we know of in the country, who collectively saved a record breaking 4,074 shelter pets. Rescue Partners also provide Medical Foster Care for some dogs during their stray hold period.


Volunteers Partnership


Volunteers were welcomed back to the shelter in 2006. They attend a formal orientation and tour to learn about the operation of Animal Services, then help with the care of shelter pets, adoptions, bathing dogs, assisting in the clinic and with events. Shelter volunteers have donated a total of 39,762 hours between FY 2006-2007 and FY 2009-2010.


As an extension of the volunteer program, the Pet Detective Club was created as well and volunteers research the Internet matching flyers of lost and found pets at the shelter or found by Good Samaritans. The Puppy Foster Care program was created in October 2008, and since then hundreds of puppies have been saved that would have otherwise been killed. Continued program for dog spays and neuters for the public for $25 

Challenges for tomorrow - reducing intake 

It will take a community effort to overcome these challenges.  A community working in partnership with Dr Pizano and her staff.    


Spay/Neuter Programs

Targeted spay/neuter programs have proven to be the only way to effectively decrease shelter intake. Examples of targeted programs include those that focus on free roaming cats, areas with high shelter intake and for low income pet owners. The Animal Services Department has developed many private sector collaborations to increase the number of donor subsidized spay/neuter opportunities in our community and are open to foster new collaborations and seek grant funding for sterilization programs.


MDAS is seeking the help of the Florida Legislature to expand use of the $5 surcharge on animal code enforcement violations to include Spay/Neuter Programs (state law currently requires proceeds from the surcharge to be used solely to pay for costs of training for animal control officers). Spay/Neuter programs help to minimize population growth and MDAS has created numerous donor-subsidized initiatives that include:


• Maddie’s Funding Received $22,000 in funding in FY 2008-2009
• Florida Animal Friends Grant Coalition plus donations to Animal Services Trust Fund helped provide 1,401 free cat spay/neuters for the public on the mobile surgical unit (MAC)
• ASPCA Pet Fair Grant Received. $24,000 in FY 2010-2011.

FY 2009-2010 to provide cat spay/neuter services for a $15 co-pay on the MAC
• Volunteer Vet Surgery Days FY09/10 funding used to continue cat sterilizations for a $15 co-pay on the MAC
• Continued efforts to apply for spay/neuter grants with PetSmart Charities
• Partnered with the Clydey Foundation 908 cats sterilized between 5 events. Hosted the spay/neuter mobile unit at Animal Services. 

• Dog Spay/Neuter Program sponsored by the Animal Services Trust Fund Offered dog spays and neuters for the public for $30 (over 700 surgeries performed) o
• Created partnership with the Humane Society of Greater Miami (HSGM).  HSGM now operates the Spay/Neuter clinic and utilizes MDAS's Mobile Animal Clinic (MAC) units.


To read the complete Miami Dade Animal Services Five Year Report:
http://www.miamidade.gov/animals/library/asd_report_2011.pdf

Thursday, April 7, 2011

Drinking the No Kill Nation's "Kool Aid"

Thought I'd share this from a fellow blogger on how incredibly simple implementing the No Kill Equation is - makes one wonder why only a hand full of the 3,500 shelters out these have been successful in implementing the steps.

The Incredible Simplicity of the No Kill Equation

It’s funny how many people have the same reactions when faced with the concept of No Kill.
“There are too many animals, not enough homes.”
“There just aren’t enough resources.”
“Pet overpopulation is due to public irresponsibility.”
“It’s going to take a long time to become No Kill.”
“We need to punish irresponsible owners.”
Etc., etc., etc.
All erroneous. Well meaning, maybe, but erroneous. The No Kill equation is so brilliantly simple. Some concepts MAY seem counter-intuitive to those who are used to blaming the public, assuming that it’s the fault of bad pet owners, etc., but when you look at the facts – it’s so damn clear.
For example, mandatory spay/neuter programs DO NOT work. They’ve been demonstrated ineffective time and time again.
There is no pet overpopulation. No Kill can happen overnight when a shelter is determined to make it happen.
Often, No Kill can actually happen UNDER a community’s budget – resources are not the real issue.
And so on.
Below are the steps of the No Kill Equation. This formula is PROVEN effective. Click here to learn more about the NKE and how to implement it. Please, please, educate yourself. Then, you can educate others – and the No Kill movement will grow, and spread, the way that ideas whose times have come, do.
I. Feral Cat TNR Program
II. High-Volume, Low-Cost Spay/Neuter
III. Rescue Groups
IV. Foster Care
V. Comprehensive Adoption Programs
VI. Pet Retention
VII. Medical and Behavior Rehabilitation
VIII. Public Relations/Community Involvement
IX. Volunteers
X. Proactive Redemptions
XI. A Compassionate Director

Of course, despite several attempts at getting clarification from the leaders of No Kill There are serious questions about implementing these steps.  They include:

I Community TNR Program - Are there adequate feral cat rescue groups to handle all the feral's needing rescue from MDAS?  Does the county commissioners endorse Trap/Neuter/Release as a viable option for feral's? 

II Low cost spay/neuter - MDAS already has a number of low cost spay/neuter programs in placed including a mobile bus that goes into neighborhoods - how would NKN suggest that program be expanded and where will the resources come from to pay for that expansion? 

III Rescue Groups - MDAS has expanded it's "rescue partner" program since Dr Pizano took over - specifically what other changes would NKN suggest?

IV Foster Care - in this context the NKE calls for shelters to foster out dogs/cats who have not been adopted.  Since the shelter is killing about 400 dogs/cats a week exactly how many foster homes would be needed EACH week to handle that number?  Who would pay for the cost of fostering - including food and medical care?  Who would manage/inspect the foster care homes.  Those who are involved in rescue know all too well how difficult it is to find enough foster homes - does NKN know something the rescue community doesn't?

V Comprehensive Adoption Programs - Adoptions from MDAS have increased dramatically under Dr Pizano's watch.  Specifically what adoption methods could be utilized and who picks up the cost involved and staffs those programs?

VI Pet Retention - As an open admission public shelter MDAS has a major problem with owners surrendering pets at the shelter.  Specifically what programs does NKN recommend to alleviate that problem?

VII Medical and Behavioral Rehabilitation - Who picks up the cost of evaluating and treating the 100 dogs/cats that enter the shelter each day?  What are those costs projected to be?  If we use a figure of $100 per dog/cat for a physical exam and shots wouldn't the cost projection be in excess of $3.5 million?  This area alone could easily add two to three times that amount to the expense of running the shelter?  Can the county justify that expense during an economic slowdown where many social programs are facing serious cutbacks?  Of course, that figure would not include treating/rehabilitating the huge number that enter the shelter lacking any type of medical care by their owners.  Considering the fact that the county ordered budget cutbacks that resulted in cutting the shelter's innovative volunteer program how does NKN get the commissioners to reverse the budget cutbacks?

How does one control disease in a high volume shelter that was never designed for this purpose?

VIII Public Relations/Community Involvement - this is one area where common ground dictates success just as was witnessed with the recent effort to save those who potentially could be exposed to the distemper outbreak.  Can the shelter management team rely on the community to step up next week when there isn't a crisis?

IX Volunteers - The volunteer program has been expanded dramatically under Dr Pizano's watch.  Specifically what programs have been overlooked?

X Proactive Redemptions - How does the shelter overcome the problem of owners surrendering pets in huge numbers that has plagued MDAS for years?

X! A Compassionate Director - Who specifically does NKN have in mind when it suggests a "compassionate" director will be able to end the killing?  What can and should that director do differently to overcome the limitations placed on the shelter operating with the same budget and regressive animal ordinances - including the ban on pit bulls.  How do you increase the number of pits and pit mixes rescued when there is a breed ban that needs repeal?

These are the questions that NKN leadership works diligently at dodging.  These questions are NOT welcome on the NKN Face Book question.  If implementing the No Kill Equation is so simple why aren't the answers to advocates questions quite as simple to find? 

Please educate yourself.

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Have the wheels come off the Miami Dade No Kill Express?

Miami-Dade Commission OK’s new animal shelter property purchase

Miami-Dade took a step closer to leaving its antiquated animal shelter on Monday when the County Commission gave officials the go-ahead to spend about $6.6 million in bond money for a property in Doral.

The 33-year-old industrial-park warehouse at 3651 NW 79th Ave. originally a post office, would be customized to replace the existing Animal Services Department complex at 7401 NW 74th St. in Medley, which a distemper outbreak recently all but shut down.


Read more: http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/04/04/2150651/miami-dade-commission-oks-new.html#storylink=fbuser#ixzz1IeSoP1J2


While this news should have been celebrated by every shelter reform advocate who has ever expressed outrage over the horrible conditions with the forty-year-old disease filled shelter, this long awaited news didn't even warrant mention.  The leadership of No Kill Nation, who have been outspoken in their condemnation of shelter management's handling of dogs and cats during the recent distemper outbreak, chose not to share this breaking news with it's 100,000 plus Facebook "fans".  Nor did the news of a new shelter being built warrant mention on the "Building a No Kill South Florida" either.


For the leadership at No Kill Nation the agenda to dethrone Dr Pizano is obviously much more important then something as simple as finally providing the dogs and cats a clean shelter for the very homeless animals they claim to advocate for.  Equally important, the significance of building a new shelter for the many rescue groups and advocates who for years have lead the charge rescuing horribly sick animals was lost as well.


This leads one to assume that the leadership at No Kill Nation has lost touch with reality.  NKN places no significance in the tremendous financial and emotional cost involved in rescuing a dog and cat from the old disease filled shelter allowing the killing to stop.  These costs include isolating animals with deadly contagious diseases, tremendous costs involved in attempting to treat animals with illnesses not limited to deadly cases of parvo and distemper and the impact that these sick animals might have on foster homes and rescue animals already in their system. 

Many rescues have simply been financially forced to abandon any rescue efforts out of MDAS leaving the animals left behind to suffer.


If we as a rescue community are ever going to turn the corner and put an end to the suffering at MDAS then building a new shelter IS the obvious first step in that process.  If the leadership at No Kill Nation doesn't understand those rescue realities then certainly they can't provide the critical leadership needed in moving Miami Dade forward in finding solutions to it's "pet overpopulation" issues. 

It will take a community effort working in partnership with shelter management in reducing the carnage and suffering at MDAS - not a power play effort at blaming all the killing on an overburdened shelter staff. 


Sadly, No Kill Nation is left with a mantra that escapes reality in thinking that the only solution to what is a forty year battle with killing innocent dogs and cats in one of the nations ten largest shelters based on intake is reading "Redemption".  

Reading a book while ignoring reality will never bring about the change suggested in Winograd's writing nor will the silence coming out of No Kill Advocacy bring about that change as well. 

It appears that riding the rails of blaming the current leadership with failing to deliver a No Kill Miami Dade is much simpler then trying to explain how this goal is attainable with the current shelter - even with a new staff.


Those of us who put the animals needs in front of a personal agenda of building a No Kill Empire understand the significance of the historic vote.  We have moved closer to finally having a new shelter the entire community can be proud of.  We understand the significance in providing the shelter staff with the tools needed to do the job WE expect them to do.  We understand the significance this courageous vote has for the rescue community in providing the much needed life saving programs we need.  We ALL should be celebrating this moment - not ignoring it's significance.


It is hoped that the leadership at No Kill Nation steps back to do some serious soul searching to determine exactly WHAT is their mission?  If we are to believe that the blame game that shelter's place on irresponsible pet owners doesn't come into play then maybe it's time No Kill Nation quits playing the blame game as well.